|
Statistical results
of the survey (schools)
Section A - Current
coverage
1. How important are
global issues in the planning and implementation of your school's
curriculum?
Fairly important -
91
Very important - 49
Not important - 34
2. In which area of the curriculum is the teaching of global issues
most prominent in your school?
Geography - 105
Citizenship/PSHE - 84
RE - 54
Humanities - 28
History - 22
Science - 19
Languages - 8
Arts (Music, Drama, Dance) - 7
Social Sciences/Economics - 5
Assemblies - 4
ICT - 3
Cross-curricular - 3
Business and Vocational qualifications - 3
Special events, circle time - 2
Leisure and tourism - 1
3. In which subject
areas do you think it could be further developed?
Citizenship/PSHE - 41
All - 31
English/Literacy - 26
Geography - 24
ICT - 17
History - 15
Science - 13
RE (RS) - 9
Arts - 8
Maths/Numeracy - 7
Languages - 5
Design and Technology - 4
Social Science/Economics - 4
33
Across
curriculum - 4
Business Studies - 3
Humanities - 2
Assemblies - 2
Tourism - 1
4. Is it the role of any particular teacher (formally or informally)
to ensure coverage of international issues?
No - 101
Yes - 32
5. How is the global
dimension integrated into your development plan?
It isn't - 35
Departmental schemes of work - 15
Whole school ethos - 5
Links with other countries - 3
EU funded projects - 2
Teacher exchanges - 1
Section B - International
connections
1. Does your school
have links with other countries?
Yes - 101
No - 60
2. If your school has
any of the following links, how important are they?
Visitors - 83 (half
these replies came from Oxfordshire)
Teacher exchanges - 82
Correspondence - 80
IT - 63
Curriculum projects - 57
Student exchanges - 51
3. What geographical
areas do they cover?
Europe - 75
Africa - 42
Asia - 28
Latin America - 13
USA/Canada - 10
Pacific - 5
Other - 2
4. Does the link fit
into any specific curriculum areas?
Languages - 24
Geography - 23
34
PSHE/Citizenship
- 17
English/Literacy - 14
Arts - 11
Extra-curricular/ethos - 11
ICT - 10
NO - 10
Science - 7
RE - 7
History - 5
Arts - 5
Cross-curricular - 5
All - 3
Maths/Numeracy - 3
PE - 3
Humanities - 2
Food technology - 1
Assemblies - 1
Leisure/tourism - 1
Respect for other cultures - 1
Section C - Current
level of outside support
1. to what extent are
you dependent on outside support for teaching global issues?
Not very dependent
- 87
Fairly dependent - 65
Very dependent - 27
2. Which of the following
organisations provide you with support?
NGOs - 55
TV programmes - 53
Professional Associations - 31
LEAs - 28
DECs - 27
Other - 16
3. What form of support
do you use?
Teaching/Activity Packs
- 141
TV/videos - 132
Artefacts - 103
Background information - 80
Visits - 78
INSET - 37
Conferences - 28
Other - 10 (including library services, textbooks, internet, newspapers,
local expertise, individuals)
3. If you do not use
support from outside organisations, why not?
35
Unaware
of support - 43
Not sure how to contact - 26
Not relevant to the curriculum - 13
Too many to choose from - 7
Other - 8 (5 cited lack of time, 1 uncertainty about quality,
1 needs too much preparation, 1 not relevant to young children)
Section D - Additional
support that you would value
1. What barriers do
you feel affect your delivery of global issues?
Lack of time - 141
Lack of resources - 87
Lack of training - 49
Lack of confidence - 26
Too controversial - 8
Lack of interest - 6
Other - 12 (mainly related to pressures of curriculum, and lack
of easily accessible up-to-date information)
2. Would you find additional
support in the following areas useful?
Audio-visual resources
- 106
Visitors - 105
IT resources - 92
Print resources - 76
INSET - 65
Other - 8
3. What might make
additional support easier for you?
Well-resourced local
centres of information - 115
Single national source of information - 59
Other - 14 (suggestions were largely related to resources, though
co-ordinated websites and NGO visits to schools were mentioned
in terms of facilitating access
4. What global issues
would you be interested in developing if given additional support?
Citizenship and democracy
- 124
Sustainable development - 112
Global interdependence - 103
Children's rights - 97
Diversity - 94
Social Justice - 87
Global development - 87
Other - 8 (including conflict resolution)
36
5.
would you be interested in future involvement in eanabling effective
support for teaching international issues? If so, how?
Teachers' working groups
- 69
Classroom research -63
Participation in forums - 56
No - 3
Other - 1 (Drama workshops)
37
Appendix
iv
Feedback from Consultation
Forum at HEC, Tower Hamlets Wednesday 6th March
Difficulties and solutions
- group exercise
| Potential
Difficulties |
Suggested
solutions |
| Curriculum constraints/time
allowance |
It's a way of
thinking/delivery. Need to have a cross-curriculum/school
ethos. |
| Pockets of resistance |
Increased financial
resources to implement global dimension with formal recognition
of the global dimension within and across the curriculum (e.g.
OFSTED, etc.) |
| Lack of quality
resources (including differentiated resources) and a lack
of awareness of the high quality resources that do exist. |
Databases - borough
specific.
Network/cluster groups to share good practice.
|
| Global dimension
seen as 'belonging' to a few specific subjects, e.g. Geography,
RS, etc and not integrated across the curriculum. |
Having a whole
school ethos which may include displays, books, cultural days,
involvement of parents, curriculum overviews. |
| Teacher knowledge,
confidence in delivery, enthusiasm, passion and fear in aspects
of global issues. |
NGO/INSET and
other teacher training |
| Co-ordination
and communication between all sectors involved. |
Structured organisation;
representatives from each body; forums; Govt. directed communication
channels. Use of INSET. |
| Teachers attitudes
as individuals |
Teacher training
assessment incorporates global dimension within standards
- TTA |
| Constraints within
the curriculum, i.e. emphasis on SATs, numeracy, literacy,
etc |
Support from borough
on cross-curricular overviews - links. Resource suggestions. |
| Fear of tackling
sensitive issues/media presentation. |
Having a whole
school policy on circle time/issues (PSHE policy) |
38
Feedback
from group discussion
| Problems |
Solutions |
| Time/curriculum
constraints |
·
It's a way of thinking - needs to be cross-curricular and
also an integral part of the whole school ethos.
· Therefore it needs to come from the SMT downwards
(although it's also got to come from LEA etc.)
· Staff pressure may also play a role - so movement
upwards to influence SMT.
· Need more flexibility in the timetable, e.g. being
able to move where you do things in the school year. |
| Teachers
attitudes as individuals - including lack of knowledge and/or
experience |
·
TTA to incorporate clear standards in their courses and assessment.
· Have whole school INSET/visitors to all staff/school.
It's important that these are in school (as there is more
likelihood of time being found for whole school activities
- although this too depends upon the SMT)
· Free assemblies for pupils (by NGOs, arts groups,
etc.) can also impact upon staff attitudes - but need to be
wary of letting them become 'stand alone' activities.
· Money is also a factor as many organisations need
to be paid.
· Include parents, and governors, to ensure they support
global activities - via school development days. |
| Co-ordination
and communication between all the sectors involved. There
are lots of people and resources but they are not always clear/appropriate/accessible/etc. |
·
Database of resources and named contacts.
· This needs to be LEA/borough specific to ensure that
it's relevant to the needs of schools in the locality.
· Schools Library Services (SLS) can provide resourcing
in some areas at present, and this could be expanded.
· Bring resources into schools, e.g. via 'salesperson',
rather than simply sending out catalogues and fliers. |
39
Current
good practice - from discussion and group feedback
- It's important to
have parents involved. This can be done through a school's Community
Link person. One school holds sessions on different aspects
of the curriculum for parents. Another school holds consultation
sessions between parents and the Head/SMT.
Responsibility: SMT
- Festival assemblies
and celebration of 'special' days (e.g. Holocaust Memorial Day,
International Women's Day, Refugee Day, etc.). However we must
be careful that these do not reinforce stereotypes, and also
that they fit into the school curriculum in an integrated way.
Who selects what to celebrate may also have implications.
Responsibility: SMT Involves: NGOs
- Environmental and
gardening clubs, also Out of School Hours Learning (OoSHL) activities;
extra-curricular activities, etc.
Responsibility: SMT and Individual Teachers Involves: NGOs,
PDC/LEA, local groups
- Class community
- respecting and valuing everyone, which then extends into the
wider community, via e.g. visits to OAP homes, etc.
- School Activities
Week - it's important to include things which are 'fun', e.g.
sport, music, arts, etc.
- Model United Nations
General Assembly
Involves: UNA
- Supporting charities/fund
raising activities but this is controversial in that we need
to ensure that we're also raising awareness, and not reinforcing
the 'victim' culture, or the idea that money solves everything.
- Teaching issues
such as Human Rights, Anti-racism, Gender Awareness, etc. This
is done either as they arise, or within defined parts of the
curriculum (e.g. tutor time/PSHE)
- Displays and multi-lingual
signs.
Involves: Pupils/Teachers/Parents
- Topic work - especially
in Early Years. Also being able to put national curriculum to
one side at times, allowing more scope/freedom in what you cover.
- Using ICT, e.g.
think.com. This is an ideal 'network' within an individual school,
in which students share views/debate an issue by email.
- Visits by NGOs,
voluntary groups, etc (e.g. CAFOD, UNICEF)
- Themed days, e.g.
Egypt day
Involves: Outside support/Visitors/Parents
- International Food
Evening
Involves: Parents
40
Suggestions
for Future Strategy
Groups to be included/
to work with:
NGOs, DECs (development Education Centres), Arts Groups, LEAs,
PDCs, Teacher Training Institutes, Schools, Teachers, Universities,
Government (DfID, DfES), Community Groups, Parents, Governors,
School Liaison Workers, Youth Groups, EMTAS, Professional Associations,
Unions, DEA, Museums, British Council, MPs, Councillors, Country
Embassies, Commonwealth Institute, Churches and Religious/Faith
Groups, North-South Centre and other non-UK partners, EU, and
the list goes on
..
Short to medium
term
·
Cluster groups of teachers, to share good practice and develop
ideas, etc. this would require funding supply cover (as people
are less willing/able to do this after school. It gives higher
status/standing if done through the school day.). LEAs and DECs
should also be involved in this process.
· Give formal recognition to what is already being done.
Use the research as a starting point to identify current examples
of good practice - and publish it (e.g. via a web site?). See
also below.
· Use a sample of schools - carry out an audit of current
global education practice. Give the schools proactive support
to enable them to raise the awareness and profile of global issues
- by engaging them in debate at all levels (including via schools
councils, tutor groups, staff, and Governors). Use the evaluation
of this sample group to help formulate future strategy.
· Share and promote resources - in schools, perhaps by
travelling 'salespeople' from NGOs, etc. This will also promote
the use of visitors, assembly work, etc.
· Provide opportunities for staff training by development
education providers.
· Lobby GLA (relevant to London only), to give greater
prominence to refugee issues, displaced people, anti-racism, green
issues, etc.
· It's vital to engage LEAs, councillors, MPs - hence pressure
groups/lobbying is needed to ensure the global dimension is seen
to be valued. Young people need to be included here, too.
· Create a resource base - of materials and people offering
INSET, etc. which is borough/LEA relevant.
Long term
· DfID needs to work with DfES - i.e. 'joined up' government.
· QCA - to give global issues a high profile in their schemes
of work - which reflect current understanding and approach (rather
than reinforce stereotypes). They need to be integrated into all
curriculum areas, with clear aims, objectives and assessment criteria.
Allowance must also be allowed for progression in knowledge, skills,
etc (as in other curriculum areas). However, there is a danger
here in that we don't want to create further workload/paperwork
for teachers via the creation of yet another 'assessed subject'
in an already overloaded curriculum.
·
Ensure a mechanism for recognising good practice - QCA are currently
developing this in relation to Equal Opportunities on their web
site, so aim to include a section on global education.
· ITT - to raise awareness and profile of global issues.
So include them in integrated way within all teacher-training
courses (i.e. not just as an add-on session).
· Engage those non-committed teachers - who will require
a different approach/strategy to those who are already 'converted'.
41
Appendix
v
Feedback from Consultation Forum, Friends House
Tuesday 19th March
Difficulties and solutions
- group exercise
| Potential
Difficulties |
Suggested
solutions |
| Lack of specific
resources aimed at different age groups. |
Websites, co-operative
teacher research and support.
DECs, etc. and catalogues, e.g. Oxfam
|
| Non-specialists
(people not feeling confident about what they're being asked
to deliver) and the potential for stereotyping (due to e.g.
lack of own knowledge) |
INSET to raise
awareness of stereotypes and assumptions, also addressing
use of images from distant places. |
| Lack of good visual
materials, e.g. Channel Four programmes. These are hard to
acquire once broadcast. |
Database of locations
of resources, which needs to be circulated. Look into the
possibility of TV archiving and/or 'selling on' to other organisations. |
| Teachers' confidence
to address politically sensitive issues, e.g. Sept. 11th |
Outside agencies
come into schools to teach politically sensitive issues. Catalyst
teacher - specialist to subject - visiting schools. |
| Time to co-ordinate
the cross-curricular teaching of global issues. |
INSET - information
about citizenship and time to work out schemes of work with
Heads of departments.
(This would take funding)
|
| Too many other
priorities for INSET time. |
Gain support of
SMT; gather enthusiastic lobbying group or self training. |
| Fieldwork to developing
countries - difficulties of fundraising/getting in touch with
grant awarding bodies. |
Greater accessibility
of information, e.g. single website with all information,
giving details of what's available, with restrictions, etc. |
It's unfortunate
that we didn't discuss the above as a whole group, but it was
useful in raising issues which will feed into the plans for the
regional strategy.
42
Planning
for the future.
Current good practice
ideas:
· 'Classic' games, e.g. trading trainers, coffee, chocolate,
etc.
· Using photos - pupils write their own questions - to
challenge perceptions/assumptions.
· Getting 'real' people in to school to talk about their
experiences.
· International days/evenings/ using 'drop' days/events
week/etc.
· Using staff as a resource.
Possible actions for
the next 3 weeks:
· Feedback to others in the school.
· Look into publishing students work - ideally on a website.
· Advertise Worldaware Globalisation Conference - see www.worldaware.org.uk
· Explore sources of resources/visitors (e.g. UNICEF/Save
the Children/ActionAid/etc) - although bear in mind not all are
free.
Possible actions for
the next 3 months:
· Identify people in the school community who would be
willing to act as a 'resource'.
· Arrange visits to school, if possible.
· If an organisation doesn't have what you need/want -
tell/email them. It may take time, but unless that's done, things
will never change.
Ideas for the future
strategy:
· Create time (and therefore need funding) to share good
practice.
· Websites to share good practice in terms of ideas with
students work. This should have LEA support/be LEA based, e.g.
Staffordshire LEA project.
· Better learning materials, targeting specific age groups,
which are laminated, etc.
· Localised directory of resources, including visitors
- as well as funds to pay those people/organisations requiring
payment.
· DfES recognition of the resources database - with links
from their publications/websites.
· OFSTED recognition of the global dimension - incorporated
into inspection criteria.
· Access to archived TV programmes/materials (including
websites).
· Improved funding for student visits to non-European countries,
as well clear, readily available sources of information about
such funding.
|